integrated essay tpo19
The reading passage and lecture are both pros and cons of advertisers effect on the customers by using a strategy called "buzzing". The reading strongly postulates that people don't know precisely whether the buzzers are paid by the company because they use a strategy that acting like discussing it in ordinary dialogue with clients to selling a product. On the other hand, Listening adamantly delineates that this conception is completely misleading because of several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that being paid workers just say anything even inaccurate information about those products so it creates complains among the users. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that in most cases companies hire the workers who actually satisfied with the products or having good judgement of it even it is correct that they get a salary.
On top of this, in lecture the professor elaborates by bringing up the points that the author's claim is entirely opposite in reality. Besides, customers always ask a lot of questions about the goods such as how long the buzzers use it. After buzzers answer those questions immediately, they don't want to buy it. these claims refute the author's indications about consumers are really pay attention to what advertisers tell about commodity also have great faith in them so they are easily trapped instead of suspect them.
The text lastly insists that the most detrimental result that buzzers are more prone to have any connection, thus it leads to customers more cautious. The speaker in the lecture counter these implications by asserting that it doesn't influence on civilization because poor companies can't afford to hire a buzzer due to their financial crisis. On the one hand, Successful companies are rich enough to employee advertisers because their products are very necessitated and receive good comments from the public.
- The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremos 80
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have?-someone who is quiet-someone who we are similar to-someone who is supportiveUse specific details and examples in your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 70
- remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils 81
- TPO24 Integrated Writing 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reading strongly postulates that people dont know precisely whether the buzzers are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nswer those questions immediately, they dont want to buy it. these claims refute the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...these implications by asserting that it doesnt influence on civilization because poor ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... on civilization because poor companies cant afford to hire a buzzer due to their fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, lastly, nonetheless, really, so, thus, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28064516129 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82490963822 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.874129518 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264860521749 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822513234682 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513771639581 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144342410394 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404496151163 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.