The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer’s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010.
The bar graph compares the rates of carmakers in the whole car sales in Europe, Asia, North, and South America, between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, the highest percentage of car sales belonged to the manufacturers of Europe in 2010. The proportion of car sales, in Asia and South America, fluctuated throughout the period.
There was a continuous increase in the number of car sales, in Europe and Asia, from the same highest point 30% in 2006 to 34% and 38% (2008), respectively. In the next 2 years, the percentage of car sales, in Europe, rose dramatically to reach a peak of 50% (2010). By contrast, the figure for car sales, in Asia, dropped significantly to 30%.
The rates of car sales, in South and North America, gradually decreased from 11% and 29% (2006) to 5% in 21% (2009), respectively. By 2010, the number of car sales in South America climbed again to the same point as 2006. By contrast, the proportion of car sales, in North America, fell dramatically to 9% which was the lowest point in 2010.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- the diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r sales belonged to the manufacturers of Europe in 2010. The proportion of car sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6404494382 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68419417543 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449438202247 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6737078728 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326098792106 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171009088881 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750052745415 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232572070775 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379707728698 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.