Do you think it is better to send criminals to jal or let them receive education or job training?
people have different views about whether or not criminals should be punished by putting them into prison. In my opinion, it would be better if the government provide offenders with education and job training.
On the one hand, there would have some certain drawbacks when all offenders are forced to go to jail. First of all, the cost of running and managing prisons is often costly as the government needs to invest much money on facilities and security. Furthermore, when criminals have to face loss of freedom, social isolation and spend years of their lives in prison, they could become dissatisfied. This would prevent them from becoming good citizens after being released. As a result, these people tend to re-offender and then being returned to prison.
On the other hand, I believe that education and job training are the best methods which may be used to help criminals become useful residents. Firstly, education could change criminals’ attitude in a positive way. being educated, criminals would be able to distinguish between right and wrong, and they would realise that it is unacceptable to fall foul of the law. Secondly, job training is extremely important for criminals as it helps them to gain a basic career after completing their sentence. if do not having enough money to make ends meet and support their family, they will be tempted to continue pursuing illegal activities. providing job training would enable them earn a living when coming back to the society, and they would no longer have motivation to break the law.
In conclusion, I think that enforement angencies should offer education and job training for criminals rather than send them to prison.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | galliano90 | 61 | view |
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 93
- Do you think it is better to send criminals to jal or let them receive education or job training? 61
- The children who grow up in a family short of money are more capable of dealing with problems in adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people have different views about whether or n...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
people have different views about whether or not criminals should be punished by putting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n could change criminals' attitude in a positive way. being educated, criminals would be abl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...inals' attitude in a positive way. being educated, criminals would be able to di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...career after completing their sentence. if do not having enough money to make ends...
^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Providing
...o continue pursuing illegal activities. providing job training would enable them earn a l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minals rather than send them to prison.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10431654676 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65402548027 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6900667373 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236771020759 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856917323831 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852548487068 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17732124563 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104744758282 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.