One Government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the sama years
The pie chart given bellow illustrate one government disburse on culture and education between 1995 to 2005 and the bar chart showed the amount of people following arts event in similar years. Over all it can be seen that in beginning year music saw the biggest disburse from government on culture and education, related with the hugest amount of people participated in music event. In contrast, the smallest participation occurred in Literature event, had similarities with the lowest government spending on arts in Literature.
Regarding to the data, government which spend on music decreased significantly from 50% to 35% between 1995 to 2005. Inverse of those, cost which spend by one government on literature had an considerable grow of 5% during five years. Followed by participated people in literature event registered rose enormously from 25000 to 35000. But the growth was lower than total of people who participated in music event reached a peak at 150000 in end year
On other hand, there was minimal increase of 5% in government which spend fund on theater, from 30% to 35% among five years as well as which occurred with number of people participation in theater event had a sharp climb although was smaller than enhancement amount of people who participated in music event. Whereas, during five years government spend found in visual arts declined rapidly from 25% to 15%. But the participation of people was bigger than literature event in 1995 and at last year the amount of people participated on visual arts event dipped from 50000 to 45000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | Brian Sahar | 84 | view |
- The differences in wheat exports over three different area 73
- The figures for imprinsonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 67
- Average CO2 Emissions per person in the Uk, sweden, italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measure are requiredpossibly some of the society possessed h 56
- Online sales for retail sectors in Canada 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...t showed the amount of people following arts event in similar years. Over all it can...
^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...end by one government on literature had an considerable grow of 5% during five yea...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...people who participated in music event. Whereas, during five years government spend fou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...amount of people participated on visual arts event dipped from 50000 to 45000
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79646260708 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492248062016 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0383153991 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460958442384 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201668043655 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652433137535 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337451275021 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485028224319 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.