C02 emissions for different forms of transport in thr european union
The bar chart given below illustrate CO2 emissions for diverge type of transport in the european union and the pie chart given below illustrate the percentage of european union donations being spent on diverge forms transport. It can be seen that air transport was the highest transport which produced CO2 emissions and coach became the smallest contributed transport. It is measured by grams. While, the biggest percentage of transport which funded by european union was roads transportation. It is measured by percentage.
Regarding to the data, 375 CO2 produced by air transport became those as the biggest CO2 emission transport and the second largest issued by passenger cars. Four other transports produced CO2 emissions less than 100, 60 for buses, maritime and rail had similarity in the amount of 50. Whereas the lowest amount of CO2 emission created by coaches
In the other hand, roads was the top of transport which funded more than 50% by european union. Followed by 31% railways transport. And six from eight transports other only financed equal to or less than 10%. Same of them have in common, 1 % for intermodal, inland waterway and airports, 2% for parts and unknown transport. While 10% funds for public transport. There was correlation between the top of transport which funded by european union with the amount of CO2 emissions released by transport those through the road
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | kushang | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Brian Sahar | 73 | view |
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 56
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 56
- The percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educatiobal setting in the uk in 2010 73
- The percentage of tourists to england who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- US spending patterns between 1996 and 1996 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ted transport. It is measured by grams. While, the biggest percentage of transport wh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ail had similarity in the amount of 50. Whereas the lowest amount of CO2 emission creat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13596491228 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68147872979 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521929824561 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.5429086432 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0769230769 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365316270841 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137589347564 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840516827495 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264555217517 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731127288983 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.