Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Human being is a creature who is constantly seeking straightforward ways toward success. As a result, the ways making a person prosperous have a high level of importance and rise debate between people. Although some people believe that successful people should only follow things they know how to do well on account of its merits such as preventing people. I agree with this attitude merely to some extent. In the following paragraphs, I substantiate my reasons to elucidate my outlook.
On the one side, inventing impressive things is one of the profound advantages of taking risk. You should be brave, courageous, and willing to embrace new ideas to try new methods that not only can lead to providing new facilities and technologies but also can make you a pioneer person. Doing what they know well, people cannot find new things to improve the quality of people’s life dramatically. All inventions throughout the world take place in the same way. For instance, consider the invention of the airplane. A very long time ago, people could not even imagine it. However, Wright brothers used their astute and bravery to turn this dream into reality. Although people mocked them due to their new approaches that seemed absurd at that time, their new strategy resulted in airplane’s invention that changes the world outstandingly. In brief, expecting new results from doing the same works as our ancestors is ridiculous.
On the other side, having a stable and convenient life and taking risk contradict each other. Through taking risk, you put yourself in a fluctuation life. It may be possible to fail several times without any success and in these periods, you should tolerate difficult situations. From this point, doing what you already know well is preferable. In addition, some occupations do not allow people to take risk in them owing to relation with people’s life. They require skillful persons. For instance, never does doctor take risks in their surgery to find new things and procedures, since failure in these situations equal to death of a person. As a result, taking risk is not always the best way to reach success.
On the whole, based on the aforementioned reasons and details, it is crystal clear that taking risk is a double-edged sword. Whereas it leads to outstanding inventions and discoveries, it can influence adversely people’s life in some circumstances.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in addition, in brief, such as, as a result, on the whole, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13231552163 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88980341002 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575063613232 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7192168617 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0416666667 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.20833333333 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35370069874 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887945205942 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815107111895 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198828922084 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769440936418 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.