The graph below shows the consumption of fish and three kinds of meat from 1979 to 2004

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and three kinds of meat from 1979 to 2004

The line graph illustrates how much fish, lamb, beef, and chicken were consumed between 1979 and 2004.

Overall, chicken consumption showed an upward trend while the figures for beef and lamp quickly decreased. On the other hand, fish was the least consumed over the period shown.

Looking at the graph in more detail, we can see that about 220 grams of beef was eaten by a person in a week in 1979. Meanwhile, the average of lamb and beef consumption was approximately 150 grams. And the figure for fish remained stable at 50 grams. In the next 15 years, while the consumption of chicken rocketed at 180 grams, the remaining kinds of meat stood at around 150 grams. Moreover, that of fish saw an unchanged figure.

In 2004, the chicken had become the most popular meat and peaked at 250 grams. The figures for beef, lamp, and fish kept decreasing and reached at 110, 60 and 40 grams respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-04 quynh le 11 view
2021-06-19 shreyk 10 view
2021-06-19 shreyk view
2021-01-24 bacon123 73 view
2020-12-31 komal7698 100 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74213836478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41471760688 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4433356444 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219561212632 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846007467289 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421073171135 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13754022465 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388631145854 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.