Health is the major aspect of one’s life. Many people are losing their capability of doing works by using inappropriate medicine for curing health issues. I completely disagree with the given statement because herbs, plants required for medicine are poisoned and doctors are not well in knowledge on natural medicines.
Firstly, the required herbals and medicinal plants are not available around us. Those plants are grown only in mountain areas, dense forests where humans can't get through it. Moreover, as we witness the environment is polluted highly and land is also poisoned, so the plants grow on such lands are not usable for making medicines. To prepare natural medicines for severe diseases it will take more time and need plethora knowledge on plants but it is easy to prepare modern medicines within a short period.
Secondly, in the olden days the plants are grown naturally without using pesticides but in these days vast usage of pesticides is takin place. So, avoiding the traditional treatment is a good opinion as per my knowledge. Additionally, the medicos in these days are lack of the knowledge about natural medicines where as our forefathers are exceptional in those aspects. the natural medicines are not prepared on the basis of modern culture but it is ease to prepare modern medicine as per civilized content.
The above-mentioned support shows that using modern medicines is apt according to present scenario. To conclude that the plants are grown in hygienic areas can be chosen for ayurvedic treatment as per modern culture.
- the bar chart below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001. 73
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged. To what extend do you agree? 73
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ntain areas, dense forests where humans cant get through it. Moreover, as we witness...
^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...f the knowledge about natural medicines where as our forefathers are exceptional in thos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...thers are exceptional in those aspects. the natural medicines are not prepared on t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69701378568 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0413170878 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.692307692 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162605430533 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562788339894 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444175630778 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101665604251 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235085835942 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.