Soon there will be something new for the tourist who has been everywhere and seen everything on Earth. Spacecraft being developed by private commercial companies will soon enable private citizens to buy their own tickets to travel into space, thereby creating a space tourism industry. so far, space travel has been undertaken only by governments, but the new, privatized spaceflight industry will bring great benefits to both science and the public.
First, private space travel will benefit serious space exploration by making spaceflight cheaper. Privatization of space technology will bring technological costs down very fast because it will allow competition--and competition is one of the strongest motivators to cut costs. Thus, lowering the cost of space travel will benefit not only space tourists but also scientists, who will be able to use private space flights for research purposes.
Furthermore, privatization of space travel will accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur. the aerospace industry already sponsors a lot of groundbreaking scientific research, and adding private spaceflight companies to it will make the industry as a whole grow in size, thereby employing more scientists than it does now. that increased number of working scientists means not only that more discoveries are likely to be made but also that those discoveries are likely to be made more quickly than in the past.
Finally, when governments are the sole providers of space travel, the costs are paid for by the whole taxpaying public, but with privatization, the expenses of space travel will be borne by the customers of the industry. The fact that private spaceflight operators will be able to raise funds through ticket sales means that the financial burden on taxpayers will be eased significantly.
According to the reading passage, privatized spaceflight industry will enable private citizens to
travel into space and thus, bring lots of great advantages to both science and the public. However,
the professor casts doubt on it and states the contrary.
First of all, it is declared in the reading that space travel, once privatized, will enhance space
exploration by lowering the spaceflight cost through competition. As a result, not also space
tourists but also scientists are benefited. They then will be able to use private space flights for their
travel or research purposes. The lecturer, nonetheless, counters this idea; he claims that private
control system will not make the industry cheaper. The spacecrafts need tested and re-tested over
the time to ensure the safety. Therefore, the price ticket cannot go down as expected.
Additionally, the privatization of space tourism, as the reading says, will speed up scientific
discoveries. The increasing number of private spaceflight companies will require more and more
working scientists, and undoubtedly, more scientific discoveries will be carried out faster than
before. This totally contrasts with the professor's idea. He points out that more scientists will
probably be attracted to work for those companies because of high salary. The purpose of research
then turns out to be 'commercial' rather than 'scientific'.
Finally, while the reading states that public tax burden of space travel will be significantly eased
when the government is no longer the only sponsor. The expenses of the industry will be paid by
its customers. However, in fact, the private spaceflight companies cannot raise such enormous
fund without the huge public tax subsidy. Tax duty, then, will certainly become more painful to
the public, according to the professor.
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 85
- Soon there will be something new for the tourist who has been everywhere and seen everything on Earth. Spacecraft being developed by private commercial companies will soon enable private citizens to buy their own tickets to travel into space, thereby crea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...before. This totally contrasts with the professors idea. He points out that more scientist...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53191489362 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80799121209 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6556991606 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7647058824 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.09492273731 488% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327159456919 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986497120953 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717596580446 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940071618288 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663263204295 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.