In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama
The article states that replace ‘let it burn policy’ with a policy of extinguishing the fire as soon as they appeared by surmising the fire incident of Yellowstone, the famous national park in the US. The author has provided three reasons to support his view. However, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the article and refutes each of the reasons given by the author.
First, the article claims that because of this policy fire caused tremendous damage to the park’s trees and other vegetation. However, Professor refutes this point by saying vegetation scorched was in time colonized by a few plants. Because of fire, there was an increase in vegetation more small plants grew as they needed open space to grow as fire destroyed the big trees. Moreover, new seeds germinate due to the high heat produced which is needed for germination.
Second, the article posits park wildlife was destroyed in a great way and eventually food chain destroyed. However, the professor opposes by saying as new opportunities for small plants to grow. The ideal habitat is been made for small animals like rabbits and hares. Results of this the predators depended on this animal also increased and food chain became more stable.
Third, the reading says that the fire compromises the value of the park as a tourist attraction and reduced the local economy. However, the professor opposes this point by explaining that it reduces the tourist attraction if the fire occurs every year. This fire was fair and usual due to a combination of low rain, dry undergrowth, and unusual harsh winds. This combination is not possible every year and since 1988 no such fire has occurred. However, she adds that the visitor came each year after the incident and there is no such reduction in tourists.
By giving above mentioned points professor cast doubts on the claim mentioned in the article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- In most developed nations, high school is a part of every student’s life. During this time, students are faced with the burdensome task of mastering their essential subject material, getting ready to enter the work force or university, and dealing with 63
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...icle posits park wildlife was destroyed in a great way and eventually food chain destroyed. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99684542587 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59981696549 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6379955623 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1764705882 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112729312748 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338271156432 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547588520795 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581766970866 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515703086647 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.