a person should never make an impoetand decision alone
Everybody faces to many situations during his life that force him to make a decision. Many people always decide about different matters in their life alone without the help of other people while others used to consult with other people for solving their problems. To some extent I subscribe to the idea that important decisions should not be meked alone.
To begin with, some situations frequently occur for different people so many they have same experiment that can be useful for others. Consulting with other people in similar situation help us to acquire more knowledge before doing an action. We will predicate the end of our decision based on the bad or good experience that others have. For instance, selecting the academic major always is a controversial issue among youths since it affect their future life. If they consult with other student before making their final decision they can imagine the consequences of their action. Hence, they can select their major based on the real end.
Second, because some important decisions directly affect people's life, making decisions in a group help them to prevent some inevitable result. Also, speaking with others before making decision can reduce the inconvenient results of them. For instance, some athlete that do danger action during their play like people who play exhibitive actions should select their dangerous performance to earn high rank among others. Since, selecting the wrong play may cause that athletes lose their life, it is necessary to speak with their coach who examine all aspect of this decision better than he. Therefore, controlling inevitable results of some decisions is one of the advantages of consulting with other before making decisions.
On the other hand, it is noteworthy to pay attention to the fact that in some situations deciding alone help youths to improve them self-confidences. Psychologist believe that some people fear to select anything without help of their adults. This behavior conducive to bad results in their life. For instance, because they cannot select their own way in many cases, some people who do not have the qualification will guide them toward bad decision like using addictive materials. This hypothesis show that youth should consult with their adult but make final decision alone to improve their personal skills.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, it is better for everyone to make essential decisions with the help of others. Getting more knowledge and controlling the result of a choice are advantages that earn during consulting with peoples.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- people benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 68
- in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future 86
- in the past it was easier to identify what kinds of careea have successful future 3
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- it is important for government to spend money to improve internet access 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uths since it affect their future life. If they consult with other student before ...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at earn during consulting with peoples.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26024096386 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60807727329 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489156626506 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6838549694 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.952380952 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161831873042 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608485587924 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063288899578 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103514097543 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311859490416 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.