Nowadays, families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this.
Why is this happening?
Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
In today's modern world, the institution of family has altered. Thus, it is evident that in most of the families, their members are often far away from one another. This essay will discuss the reasons for this phenomenon and will also examine the benefits and the drawbacks of this change.
To begin, the first and main reason is the extremely busy lifestyle. The vast majority of the population works 8 or sometimes 12 hours daily and spend approximately 45mins in huge traffic lines in order to go to their jobs and back home. That is why they do not have time to communicate deeply with the other members of the family. Another factor is the fact that we live in a society dominated by social media. Most of the teenagers are more interested in their online life than interacting with their family in their free time.
It could be argued that this has benefits. For example, young people without the heavy pressure and criticize from their relatives, usually feel free to follow their dreams and achieve something great in their lives. Although, I believe that the loss of a strong connection amongst families could become very dangerous. To explain that, children could easily mislead and manipulated by strangers, especially nowadays due to the internet. Also, there is an increased number of mental illnesses in children, because most of them blame themselves for the limited contact with their parents.
In conclusion, the busy lifestyle has changed dramatically the way that families were a few decades ago. However, all of have to try to change this situation that has many negative outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Humayan Kabir | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | gies5566 | 78 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons f 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society. To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sure and criticize from their relatives, usually feel free to follow their dreams...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...achieve something great in their lives. Although, I believe that the loss of a strong co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amilies were a few decades ago. However, all of have to try to change this situat...
^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uation that has many negative outcomes.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97037037037 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55328938707 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640740740741 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2503639828 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174042997445 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543560114492 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064134870966 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10925482169 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612306120511 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.