Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
The table compares the information of the popular fast foods consumption in melbourne for the year 2005, present and for 2025.
Firstly, Hamburgers consumption is slightly decreased to 38 at present, in future it may rise up to 51 units from 40 units in 2005.
Salads consumption is increasing rapidly over time from 5 units at 2005 reaching a highest of 41 units at 2025 and present lies at 15 units. Fried rice and Noodle follows the steady incline, whereas only fried rice is constant between present and future.
Fired chicken being the most likely food of Melbourne reaches 45 units in future, and it is the second consumed food in present and past at 35 and 37 units respectively.
Food consumed by native peoples keep on increasing except for hamburgers which follows slight decrease, whereas in future it was predicted to be top the list. Salads are only 6 units lesser that the hamburgers which is a good sign of people consuming healthy foods. Chicken familiarity is not faded away over the year.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour 89
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 81
- The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...res the information of the popular fast foods consumption in melbourne for the year 2...
^^^^^
Line 14, column 82, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...over time from 5 units at 2005 reaching a highest of 41 units at 2025 and present...
^
Line 16, column 72, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...kely food of Melbourne reaches 45 units in future, and it is the second consumed food in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82296650718 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58917555228 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3885344017 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188761193729 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077757902446 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839006371954 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142680898488 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160771371482 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.