The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.
The line graph gives information on the number of visits made by international tourists to Australia annually, and the table compares the figures for visitors from six different countries from 1975 to 2005.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of international visits to Australia. Also, it is clear that most of the tourists coming to this country were Japanese, while Chinese people seemed less interested in this country than the others over a period of 30 years.
Looking at the line graph, in the first year, there were only 10 million foreign visits to Australia. This number continued to go up significantly and finally reached a peak of over 30 million after three decades.
Turning to the table, Japan remained its first position in the number of citizens traveling to Australia with the figure rising nearly fourfold to 12.0 million in 2005. Came next on the list was South Korea with 9.1 million people, which was 3 times higher than that in 1975. Also in 2005, Australia welcomed more tourists from Britain and Europe with 2.9 million and 4.5 million people, respectively. By comparison, China and the United States contributed insignificant numbers of travelers to Australia with only around 1 million. As can be seen, the total number of tourists coming from the six countries increased by nearly three and a half times to 30.4 million after 30 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | pritam | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | krunalptl29 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 61
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location. 78
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 11
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph gives information on the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99137931034 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60875230427 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573275862069 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.14888962 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218553478577 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955448069787 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918300994247 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163912282278 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108073386976 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.