The figure shows the number of workers employed in three different areas in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The figure shows the number of workers employed in three different areas in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 1990.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the trend of workforce in three main section in the United Kingdom from 1980 to 1990.

As can be seen, there was an increase in the number of workers employed in Service Industries between 1980 and 1990. Starting at about 5,500,000 in 1980, the number increased marginally to around 6,000,000 in 1986. Then, it surged to above 8,500,000 in 1988 and stay stable till 1990.

On the contrary, both the figures of the people worked in Engineering and Agriculture declined dramatically. The workforce of engineering field went down gradually from 4,000,000 in 1980 to approximately 3,000,000 in 1990. Whilst, the number of people served in Agriculture dropped sharply to just below 1,000,000 in 1985 and kept decreasing to just about 400,000 in 1990.

Overall, there were some major changes in the allocation of workforce among three fields in the United Kingdom from 1980 to 1990. People tended to join the service industry more and more. Whereas, there were decreases in the other two sections.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-26 Amirreza 84 view
2019-07-10 nicknguyen 56 view
Essays by user nicknguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...es the trend of workforce in three main section in the United Kingdom from 1980 to 1990...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oin the service industry more and more. Whereas, there were decreases in the other two ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12574850299 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67670698803 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2145511689 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177295983589 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795278986292 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794328246544 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132058428271 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061652186927 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.