The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table demonstrates the shift of British vehicles preference by comparing the average distance in miles travelled per person per year in 1985 and 2000.
overall, it is immediately clear that car was always the most favourable modes of transportation in both years while taxi was the least prefered vehicle.
To begin with, it is noticable that car use was the primary way of transportation for english commuters in these years with the figure of approx 3200 miles of average in 2000. On the other hand, taxi used was the least common mode of carriers, although the travelling distance of it was increase over three times than that of 1985, it was still negligible.
According to the table, walking and biking saw no significant alteration in data but a slightly decrease brought bicycle to the bottom of preference in 2000. Besides, local bus saw a plummet in statistic with approx 145 miles decreased in average. In contrast, train and long distance bus usage became a lot more popular as both of these modes of commuting hiked in 2000. However, long distance bus was still far less than that of local bus in 2000.
In summary, english travellers' overall average distance went up from about 4750 to approx 6500 over 15 years. In addition, car usage remained to be the major mode of transportation.
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 84
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that circumstances of an individual crime a motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment Discuss bot 42
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your a 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...table demonstrates the shift of British vehicles preference by comparing the average dis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...r person per year in 1985 and 2000. overall, it is immediately clear that car was a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...w no significant alteration in data but a slightly decrease brought bicycle to the bottom of prefer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast, in summary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90178571429 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68166488037 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.910666918 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985131556574 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411417207577 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268434418607 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594655700273 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255894310935 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.