Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
At the present time, highachieving sport experts are warmly welcomed by people all over the world like movie stars. Therefore, with the support of media, they gain an enormous load of money for their achievements. However, this starts a strong controversy as other essential specialists' salary (such as scientists in different fields ) in almost nothing comparing to sport stars. Thus, this essay will discuss both views before giving personal opinion.
On the one hand, admittedly, successful sport players or coaches need a long time training intensively before reaching their glamorous careers. Hence, there are not many athletes can get through the tough challenges on their ways of pursuing bright goals. Moreover, every sport winning on a world scale bring not only fame but also pride to the nation identity. Consequently, sport stars have an extensive influence on the community and benefit financially from that.
On the other hand, obviously, it is unjustified for professionals in crucial major like politics, healthcare and science because they earn far less than famous sportsmen. Apparently, these essential experts' accomplishments are a lot more beneficial to our society than sport professionals. Typically, in specific areas of science such as medical experts, chemical specialists, economic scholars, ect, by various scientific and investigational project in different aspects, they have made lots of valuable researches, which will help to improve living standard, save people lives or boost the national economy when it is put into practice. In contrast, sportsman mainly show their talent for audiences to entertain.
Personally, although, to a certain extent, I agree with the massive incomes of famous sport specialists, I think it is still unfair for other experts working in important fields as their efforts in contributing human lives are worth more than they are receiving at present. In addition, I feel that people should change their attitude as they need to realize the adequate heroes, they should be the ones who give us practical benefit in social life not the people who just help us to entertain.
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'specialists'' or 'specialist's'?
Suggestion: specialists'; specialist's
...a strong controversy as other essential specialists salary such as scientists in different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y such as scientists in different fields in almost nothing comparing to sport sta...
^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...y will discuss both views before giving personal opinion. On the one hand, admittedly, succes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, i feel, i think, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40718562874 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87564836316 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6126288412 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233955490369 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694494960267 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052404066791 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128969863878 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518769210876 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.