The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The charts illustrate about the average of household expenditures between Japan and Malaysia in 2010. There are five different of categories specifically housing, transport, food, health care, and other goods and services. Overall, it can be seen the largest household expenditures in Japan was other goods and services whilst the highest spending in Malaysia was housing category.
Other goods and services happened be the biggest proportion on the household expenditures especially for Japan in standing at 29% which different from Malaysia only at 26%. The second part was 6% held by Japan health care which dissimilar from Malaysia simply 3%. Then it was by transport which was 20% in Japan which preponderated from Malaysia just at 10%.
On the other denomination, food expenditures of Japan got 24% which was lesser than Malaysia food expenditures was 27%. Otherwise, housing services made up 21% in Japan and 34% in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 73
- many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34459459459 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89279949132 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.62643675 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27871061901 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155000988399 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140278536496 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211125029955 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643138022474 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.