People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
The crux of the topic is that people's attitude and their behaviour are more influenced by recent and immediate situations rather than by society as a whole. I personally disagree with the statement for the following reasons and I am going to provide some examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, humans are socialize creature and human behaviour and their characteristics are influenced by myriad thing and society as a whole are one of the greatest factors of them all. Because society had its own character and it is difficult to marginalize the whole society. From our childhood, our parents, family, friends, and milieu have a great effect on us. Children are behaving more or less how their surrounding people behave around them and that learning thorough surroundings affects the young minds in a long term and left a mark, even sometimes for life long, because those characteristics they practice from their childhood.
Societies absolutely affect the people's mind in a lifelong way and we did not change our behavior in a certain amount of time because it became the habit of humans. In a particular situation or a particular time, we might act differently but does not reflect the whole the attitudes of a person. We did not develop an attitude or persona in a brief of time, it is a gradual process. For example, in our early childhood, we developed character from our family and parents. We behave more like our parents and even after many years, we can find semblance in the character between parents and their children. Later days the influx of outer ambiance greatly influenced us. For example, in our school and colleges, friend and other adventitious factors influenced us, and later days work place influence our characteristics. So, the whole society that affects the behavior of a person on slowly and step by step manner.
On the other hand, people might argue that immediate situations influenced human behavior more than society. People might act differently than their actual behabiour and some people might be said that sudden situations can be brought out the actual character of a person where he might have acted in a deceitful manner in keeping his public persona. That argument might be true but it is also true that due to a different character which they developed in a lifelong, they act differently and some people handle a situation calmly than other because that kind of attitude they developed, which can not achieve in one situation.
At the epilogue of the topic, for the above reasons I believed that societies effect to our attitude is more influential than immediate situations, but at last, I would say that the humans developed an attitude in a gradual process and immediate situations and surroundings are also part of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Amberkury | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Mirzz | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | krishnaprasad7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | abc221 | 33 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Inbar Amit | 66 | view |
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 58
- Essay topics: The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, 50
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 70
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing TaskEvery year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'socialized'.
Suggestion: socialized
...er my stance. First of all, humans are socialize creature and human behaviour and their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a lifelong way" with adverb for "lifelong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ties absolutely affect the peoples mind in a lifelong way and we did not change our behavior in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a deceitful manner" with adverb for "deceitful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r of a person where he might have acted in a deceitful manner in keeping his public persona. That arg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roundings are also part of our society.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, even so, for example, kind of, first of all, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95512820513 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7661517057 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465811965812 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1509263478 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343216063555 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111738914906 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123727411233 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221201820647 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704337409541 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.