Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
Art and innovation state a country's prosperity, but when the country is in privation government funding should be stopped because is cruel to use that money on art when common people are live in penury. I, personally agree with the statement and going to provide some epitome to bolster my stance.
The government funds should be used for public welfare. Funds are common people tax paying money and should be used in corroborate the economy and industry and solve the unemployment problems. When people's basic needs are not being fulfilled then use that money on art prosperity is wrong and inappropriate. Besides, the government can not profit from painting or arts when people do not have jobs and foods how they could buy or appreciate the art.
Instead of using government money there is always another source like private funding. There is a myriad example when an artist creates art in private funding. In the era of the great depression, art projects and other exhibitions had failed, because people do not have the luxury to visit the exhibition. Innovation and art have a relationship with the country's prosperity. For example, in a war zone, a child does not demand painting or people does not demand a museum.
On the other hand, people might argue that art and innovations are a form of income for people and seal the opportunity from them is also cruel. But, when a country is in emergency government funds, should be used for peoples shelter, foods and jobs creations. Besides, there is plenty of philanthropic who could help artists.
The epilogue of the topic I would say that art is for inner expression and imagination and imagination does not work in hunger. The statement does not tell to stop the funding forever, just suspended for the time of emergency. When a country is in depression, using government funds might sound harsh and unfeasible decision.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wil 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 58
- Science is meaningless without religion. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f philanthropic who could help artists. The epilogue of the topic I would say th...
^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stopping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'tell' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: stopping
... in hunger. The statement does not tell to stop the funding forever, just suspended for...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, then, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92767295597 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69354445982 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503144654088 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2787172971 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362688208383 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123242450785 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839324188752 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22232746663 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577792803772 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.