The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue whether questioning authority by the people of society enhances the well being of the society or not. Indisputably, not questioning the authority can enable authority to make quick decisions. Nevertheless, not questioning the authority can make the authority a monarchy. Thus, I generally agree that questioning the authority by people of society will enhance the well being of society.
First of all, questioning the authority keeps the authority on its toes and make them liable and responsible towards society's betterment. The representatives are chosen to run the authority with the sole purpose of serving towards betterment of society. To illustrate, let us look at example of a state governor chosen to run the state. As a public representative the governor is liable to answer to the questions from the residents of the state and must work towards betterment of the state. citizens of the state asks question to their governor via multiple mediums and the governor responds to those questions.
Furthermore, if a representative in a position of authority is not questioned by the people it can turn the set up to a monarchy. For example, Adolf Hitler turned into a dictator and made himself so strong as none of his actions and policies were ever questioned by the citizens of Germany.
Also, questioning the authority allows for exchange of ideas which can lead to improvements. One such example can be public open forum conducted by minister of state which allows common people of the state to question the minister on existing policies. such discussion and questions provoke ideas and bring about change which is helpful for society.
In conclusion, although opening the authority to public questioning can hamper the speed at which the authority can take decisions. As long as some measures and thresholds are set, questioning the authority can be very fruitful. In fact, questioning the authority can bring about a change which can result in enhancing the society.
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 66
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developin 75
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 23
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Citizens
...t work towards betterment of the state. citizens of the state asks question to their gov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...tion the minister on existing policies. such discussion and questions provoke ideas ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23853211009 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00818585988 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470948012232 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2858915939 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.764705882 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176335525928 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749190175998 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055504531888 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109605690318 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420089637883 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.