The reading and the lecture both discuss whether dinosaurs were endothermal mammals or not. While the reading states that are three significant evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms, the lecture of the other hand refutes each of the evidence provided in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether dinosaurs were endothermal mammals or not. While the reading states that are three significant evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms, the lecture of the other hand refutes each of the evidence provided in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading claims that dinosaurs' fossils which have been found in the polar region indicate that only endothermal mammals are able to maintain their body temperature in such cold climate. On the other hand, the lecture argues that the polar region was warmer than today. therefore, it is quite possible that dinosaurs could migrate to warmer areas or hibernate. Consequently, the fossils evidence does not support that polar dinosaurs were endotherms.
In addition, the reading asserts that dinosaurs' leg position underneath its body and not on the side is clear evidence that dinosaurs engaged in physical activity like running. therefore, there is a direct connection between endothermy and leg position. However, the professor challenges this point by pointing out that Just like a crocodile, dinosaurs had their legs underneath their body to support its body structure and hold extra body weight and not for physical activity purpose. therefore, there is no correlation between endothermy and legs position.
Finally, the reading contends that the presence of haversian canals in dinosaurs' bone structure is another indicator that these mammals were endothermy. The author explains blood vessels and nerves inside Harversian canals allow animals to grow faster which is a characteristic of endotherms. On the other hand, the lecturer averts this claim by saying that dinosaurs bone structure content not only haversian canals but also growth rings. According to the professor, the growth rings allow a fluctuant growth pattern (rapid growth followed by slow growth or no growth) which is not a distinctive characteristic of endothermal animals. Whereas, rapid growth is a feature for endothermal dinosaurs.
- tpo 32 3
- TPO 55 Writing 1 Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of 57
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 30 Burning mirrors 80
- Technology has made children less creative than before 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce provided in the reading passage. First of all, the reading claims that di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...the polar region was warmer than today. therefore, it is quite possible that dinosaurs co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat polar dinosaurs were endotherms. In addition, the reading asserts that di...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...aged in physical activity like running. therefore, there is a direct connection between e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 487, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... and not for physical activity purpose. therefore, there is no correlation between endoth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween endothermy and legs position. Finally, the reading contends that the p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54692556634 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75713721001 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501618122977 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7133958049 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.266666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4665585442 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169437733709 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22242383395 0.0662205650399 336% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361755907285 0.162205337803 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353944117217 0.0443174109184 799% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.