A nation requires all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they join college.
People have different interests, talents and ability to perform so by coercing the same national curriculum on every student is not judicious. Every student in the country should be given equal opportunities to excel in his/her field of interest and showcase his/her talent. Therefore, I do not concur with author's idea of same curriculum throughout the nation.
On the first facet, the development and future of the naton is in the hands of the students only. The growth of any nation is not judged by only the education sector but also the development in other sectors as well. Therefore, by making the national curriculum the same for all the students is like treating every student on the same bar. For example, If a boy is having an interest in arts. But, the education system is so rigid that there are very fewer opportunities for him to pursue his career in arts. Therefore, it will limit him and in turn it will limit nation to have individuals profient in arts.
Secondly, though in India we have same curriculum till high school but, after that we are given the chance to choose our subjects and fields of our interest. For example, the students who want to be an engineer choose science as their fields, the students who wants to be an accountant choose commerce as their field. On the other hand if we limit them by having same national curriculum for all then we would not have adept engineers nor proficient accountants.
Additionally, there are students who are not good at one thing but may dominate in other sectors. But, the limitations of the same curriculum will not let them to know their ability and due to underperformance and peer pressure there can be adverse effects on them. They might go to depression also. But, if we give him/her the flexibility to pursue the career of his/her choice then there is a possibility that we can get a skilled individual in that sector.
In the crux, as a nation to develop and have a reputation for all-round ability in the world we need students in each department. Therefore, the idea of having the same curriculum for all the students is not viable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | goelchirag21 | 50 | view |
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 59
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 75
- In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably acco 82
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and fields of our interest. For example, the students who want to be an engineer ...
^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ts on them. They might go to depression also. But, if we give him/her the flexibilit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74594594595 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69599166797 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464864864865 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3758246269 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26095048629 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983074551226 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091425195455 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170665449761 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600328078983 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.