The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Every government, industry or any other field has a need of pragmatic leader so that field can make decision for the betterment of the society. The leader should possess foresight and insight to make a viable decision and that have minimum disadvantages. To incorporate such skills one should have the will to excel and surmount all the difficulties. Therefore, sense of competition is ver necessary to develop these skills.
On the first facet, if we consider the government of any country. Elections take place to give people the chance to choose their government. The parties which are standing in the elections does have competition between them so that they can exhort people to vote for them. In order to get their vote bank filled they try to persuade people by various offers for the betterment of the public. The competition between the parties is a benefit because all the parties try to give more attractive and persuading promises and after winning they have to keep it.
Secondly, in any industry if someone wants to be a leader, he/she has show his/her worth by performing peerlessly. If someone is having the ability to work more accurately and efficiently then that person is surely the contender for the leadership role for that industry. And to transcend and work beyond limits, competition is very necessary. For example, if there is a vacancy for the designation of project manager. Then the person who has done more efficiently will be chosen but competition gives the opportunity to all to work extraordinary and make their remark. Moreover, it will be better for the industry also as more meticulous and prudent person will be given the job.
Additionally, cooperation is also very important for a leader to work with the team. However, sometimes a situation arises when a decision has to be taken through foresight and there comes the responsibility of the leader to take a tenable decision. For example, in India, a huge amount of fake currency was circulating in the market. And prime minister, Narendra Modi took a bold decision to change the currency. That decision was very difficult to handle because all the economy of the country just shattered as no one was aware of it. Many of the officials in the government did not concur the idea of demonetization but, Narendra Modi took that decision. However, it turned out be a good decision for the counrty.
In the crux, for a leader cooperation is very improtant trait. However, without competition one can not show case the ability to be a leader and can not excel. Competiton gives edge over the others and make your case of being a leader more substantial.
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 72
- Claitown University needs both affordable housing for its students and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings. It is common knowledg 83
- In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably acco 82
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 66
- Allergies are an overreaction of the immune system to certain stimuli. One view is that allergies can develop as the result of childhood exposure to certain irritants, such as dust or animal dander, while the immune system is not yet mature. Another view 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91517857143 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80922073565 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479910714286 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4146633486 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.08 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190971514054 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548797136691 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614629863132 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101628091786 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310771896824 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.