Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic congestion has become a common problem around the world, and the solutions to this trouble are various. Many people believe that increasing frequency of transport tool would be the best way, but I would argue that many other methods can be better choice.
If the transportation tools can be taken without time limits, the traffic congestion during the commuting time may be mitigated, because many working people can choose to go home or other destinations more flexibly. These public transports can enable them to take no matter what time it is. For example, managers are frequented to bus station when they need to get off work if they public transportation has limited shifts. As a result, it may cause super crowded road due to tons of cars and buses running at the same time. By contrast, when these workers can have more choices about time shift, they may delay their plan that can make a positive impact on the traffic congestion.
However, governments who can invest more capital on the subways will reduce the congested traffic greatly. On the road, there are always full of cars, buses, bikes and so on, those hold the key to the efficiency of traffic transportation. If there is something wrong with these tools, it is fair to say that the traffic will become congested. In contrast, the tube will not have this question, because there are just trains underground. As a consequence, it will help reduce the burden of road due to a wide range of transportation tools.
Another good way is that citizens driving private cars should pay more tax because they cause the emission of gas and traffic congestion. Many people should consider economic context when they want to drive their own cars. City traffic crowding are main cause of the number of private cars increasing. When private drivers are subject to high tax, they may choose public transport tools. Consequently, there will not be more personal cars on the road and this solution to the main reason of traffic congestion may be effective in terms of coping with the problem of traffic.
In conclusion, although the increase in frequency in public transports will be a good method to solve traffic congestion, I would reckon that building new subways or deterring people from driving private cars would be better.
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as wellas the prevalence of online shopping in these countriesSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 61
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In thethe interest of public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day 7 days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a wide range of transportation tools. Another good way is that citizens drivin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 7.85571142285 318% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91494845361 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60364263867 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.081329157 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.944444444 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1450600942 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501871294687 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284698988953 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900966009354 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178009558077 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.