describe line graph
The line graph compares five sectors in terms of the number of people using different communication services over a period of 10 years worldwide.
It is clear that from 1998 to 2008, there was a slight increase in the number of each communication service users. The most remarkable increase was seen in cellular phone service.
In 1998, the figures for Cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased during the remainder of the period; however, cellphone service gained the higher position in 2008 at around 60 users per 100 in habitants. This statistic was three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
From the time onwards, the number of inhabitants using three other types of service nearly stayed unchanged with the slightly increase from 13 to 15 per 100 habitants for landline service. Also, the figures for Mobile and Fixed broadband shared the similar pattern which both started at a very low number in 1998 and reached nearly 5 per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 11 | view |
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. Whatare the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- describe line graph 11
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 81
- Writing an essay (250 words) about the topic “Challenges of global manager” 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of Internet service in the same year. From the time onwards, the number of inh...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 1615.20841683 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91011235955 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55165051258 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3265219006 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0437594851011 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222948123267 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589865289432 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445896246533 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07723149539 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.