The diagrammatical representations demonstrate how the Meadowside village has been continuously changed together with fonton and a town of other people in 1985 and today in comparison with 1962.
Overall, it is palpable that a lot of infrastructure was improved in the village area which completely flourishing the today's scenario.
Discerning the diagram, on north-west side, there was only Meadowside village but in 1985, it has been made properly with a leisure complex facility. Apart from this, the housing system has been provided which just above the road. Subsequently, at the bottom side, super store has been also constructed.
Analysing further, in 1985,there was no another change arised on the area of Fenton except the new straight road but now, the area of village and fonton is connected to each other and also another railway line is made with the existing one particularly on north-east side.Moreover, hotel and station are organized in the center and business park is made which just besides to station.
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years.What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 56
- Scientists contribute more to society so science students should get more support To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
- Many people con of choose to study at university in another country. What kind of problems do you think they would encounter and what are the positive aspects of a decision like this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de village has been continuously changed together with fonton and a town of other...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r with fonton and a town of other people in 1985 and today in comparison with 196...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...e area which completely flourishing the todays scenario. Discerning the diagram, on...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t from this, the housing system has been provided which just above the road. Subs...
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also constructed. Analysing further, in 1985,there was no another change aris...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Analysing further, in 1985,there was no another change arised on the area of Fe...
^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ing one particularly on north-east side.Moreover, hotel and station are organized in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and station are organized in the center and business park is made which just bes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, moreover, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00821797279 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.295483706 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174201988815 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880374552633 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725431081112 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11155814362 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798787652707 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.