The graph below shows the percentage of 18-25 year olds in the Universities in four different countries.
The line graph shows the proportion of students aged 18-25 studying in the universities of Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand from 1961 and 2011.
On balance, the percentage of students attending to tertiary education in all four South-east Asian countries increased over six decades with Thailand and Singapore accounting for the significant majority.
In details, the percentage of Thai students decreased from 25% in 1961 to 20% in 1991, however, this was followed by a dramatic increase and they doubled their attendance as high as 42% in 2011. Similarly, 15% of students in Singapore were going to universities and their percentage grew markedly and reached 40% by 2011 despite having fluctuations in 1981 and 2011 when the numbers dropped to 25% and 35% correspondingly.
Meanwhile, about 2% of Malaysian and 7% Filipino students studied for a degree in 1961 and their percentages equalled to 15% in 1991. After that, the former group levelled off in their proportion, whereas, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows the percentage of 18 25 year olds in the Universities in four different countries 75
- The given line graph shows the past and projected figures on the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas 78
- The pie chart shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 89
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 56
- Some people think that individuals today are more dependent on each other Others believe people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease and they doubled their attendance as high as 42% in 2011. Similarly, 15% o...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Singapore were going to universities and their percentage grew markedly and r...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, whereas, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the p...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23121387283 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98499930587 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618497109827 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1207007874 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1601290185 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797415210156 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668429624563 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102192015183 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706471275399 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.