The line graph illustrates the percent of 18-25-year-olds enrolled in tertiary education programs in four countries namely Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Phillippines from 1961 to 2011. In 1961, the proportion of 18-25 years Thais enrolled in university was 25 percent and it was followed by Singapore at 15 percent. By contrast, the percentage studying at universities in the Phillippines and Malaysia was only 7 and 2 percent respectively. From 1961 to 1991, there was a slight decrease in the proportion of Thailand studying at universities, while the proportion increased slightly to around 15 percent for both Malaysia and Phillippines. In Singapore also the proportion rose but with fluctuations and in 1991, about 35 percent of 18-25-year-olds were enrolled in universities. Secondly, over the last two decades from 1991 to 2011, the proportion of Singaporean , Pilipino, and Thai was going up, whereas the figure in Malaysia remained unchanged. In 2011, the percentage stood at around 40 percent each in Singapore and Thailand, while the figure for Phillippines and Malaysia were considerably lower at 15 and 10 percent respectively.
overall, it can be seen that Singapore had the highest proportion of 18-25-year-olds studying at universities for a majority of a given time period. Also, there was an increase in the proportion for opting higher education in all the given countries.
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of cars produced in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information below in your own words 69
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001 The data given is for all marriages remarriages and first marriages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rams in four countries namely Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Phillippines fro...
^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only 7 and 2 percent respectively. From 1961 to 1991, there was a slight decreas...
^^
Line 1, column 873, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1 to 2011, the proportion of Singaporean , Pilipino, and Thai was going up, wherea...
^^
Line 1, column 1149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ower at 15 and 10 percent respectively. overall, it can be seen that Singapore h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...and 10 percent respectively. overall, it can be seen that Singapore had the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42201834862 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36212002249 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2631923443 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205744390842 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105399489429 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987075710607 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162586484805 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250396613551 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.