The graph below shows the percentage of 18-25 year olds in the Universities in four different countries.
The line graph shows the proportion of students aged 18-25 studying in the universities of Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand from 1961 and 2011.
On balance, the percentage of students attending to tertiary education in all four South-east Asian countries increased over six decades with Thailand and Singapore accounting for the significant majority.
In details, the percentage of Thai students decreased from 25% in 1961 to 20% in 1991, however, this was followed by a dramatic increase and they doubled their attendance as high as 42% in 2011. Similarly, 15% of students in Singapore were going to universities and their percentage grew markedly and reached 40% by 2011 despite having fluctuations in 1981 and 2011 when the numbers dropped to 25% and 35% correspondingly.
Meanwhile, about 2% of Malaysian and 7% Filipino students studied for a degree in 1961 and their percentages equalled to 15% in 1991. After that, the former group levelled off in their proportion, whereas, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the period.
- Some people think that individuals today are more dependent on each other Others believe people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 56
- Some people think that individuals today are more dependent on each other Others believe people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 20
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies.- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant. 11
- The given line graph shows the past and projected figures on the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease and they doubled their attendance as high as 42% in 2011. Similarly, 15% o...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Singapore were going to universities and their percentage grew markedly and r...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, whereas, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the p...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, the latter grew steadily to reach to almost 20% at the end of the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23121387283 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98499930587 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618497109827 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1207007874 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1601290185 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797415210156 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668429624563 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102192015183 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706471275399 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.