It may not necessarily that the person should be an expert. Everyone can present the view should be an expert. Everyone can present the understanding on the subject matter, no matter if he works in that field In addition, to present one's critical judgment it need not exactly be expert; an inexperienced person can also present what an expert could not discern.
When it comes to critical judgment, the only thing that should matter is how it is appropriate to everyone. Maybe what an expert thinks may not be validated by public consensus. There are many field that benefits general people like movies, politics, country's diplomatic relations In the case, it is the general public, who are actually the consumers, whose critical, economics, literature, art, etc., a movie which the directors, actors, producers and everyone in the movie industry have like them or disliked them. Judgment should actually matter in order to make profit.
However, there are some fields where the critical judgments of only experts has values like science. Science is an esoteric subject, usually too hard to interpret by common people. In this case, someone who is working in the particular makes only make valuable critical judgment Since science is broad field, even within this, expert in one field can also provide his critical judgment to another field. For an example, biologists can interpret and present his views regarding aerospace.
No matter what field you are working in, it is possible that someone who is expert may also fail to point out the important aspect that one is non expert in the field. But this is not true in every field where basic intuition is required to evaluate the subject matter .
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- “Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting y 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores."In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movie Galore's ten video rental stores. Since we 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fields'.
Suggestion: many fields
...alidated by public consensus. There are many field that benefits general people like movie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...ted by public consensus. There are many field that benefits general people like movie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...omatic relations In the case, it is the general public, who are actually the consumers, whose ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[3]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'liked'.
Suggestion: liked
...and everyone in the movie industry have like them or disliked them. Judgment should ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal judgments of only experts has values like science. Science is an esoteric sub...
^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... required to evaluate the subject matter .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 283.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04946996466 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54603275336 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544169611307 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4101832821 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257255509936 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092879009197 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660225400271 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163395941272 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451508940879 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.