In many countries, women and men are working full-time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern society females works on an equal footing with men. This exactly why both sexes should be sharing domestic chores. I totally agree with this opinion because gender roles are changing over the course of time and people have to keep up with times.
Firstly, looking back at the past, men were breadwinners, while women were staying at home and were responsible for taking care of children and housekeeping. It was fair distribution of the workload and family responsibilities. Families were large and had five to seven children; consequently, women were not able to take full-time jobs. Nowadays, families became significantly smaller, females along with males started to complete institutions and have permanent employment. Even sometimes, a woman is a main family provider, so it would be unfair to demand from women to do house cleaning and cooking without sharing it with men.
The second reason why part of the chores should be allocated to males is women physically are not able to maintain all their duties. It should not be forgotten that main part of the burden of up-brining children lays on the woman’s shoulder. Accordingly, males have to split the burden and be responsible for domestic workload in order to ease it. This way, all daily house routines will be done more effectively and wives will have some spare time for themselves. As a result, their husbands will find happy and satisfied women next to them. For example, I am a working person and have to do all household chores by myself; thus, sometimes I feel exhausted and do not want to attend a dance class, which is my passion.
In conclusion, the modern style of life demands from both genders to share their duties and help each other as much as possible. I completely agree that it is necessary measure, as it will contribute in women’s happy and fulfilled lives.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-12-15 | adish123 | 61 | view |
2020-10-28 | naina.1234 | 56 | view |
2019-10-01 | Mariamirabella | 71 | view |
2019-07-30 | Mariamirabella | 95 | view |
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 78
- You visited your friend s hometown last month and promised to meet him but you could not Write to your friend Expressing your apology Explaining why you couldn t meet Suggesting when to meet later 73
- It is sometimes thought that people who travel outside of their own country are more tolerant and understanding of others To what extent do you agree 92
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In some countries the number of people who visit art galleries is declining What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this situation 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: LAYS_ATOP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lies on'?
Suggestion: lies on
...rt of the burden of up-brining children lays on the woman's shoulder. Accordingly,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, so, thus, while, even so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94920634921 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7643667188 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8490867453 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212677983238 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626778366131 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468332720287 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116133105573 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288825666871 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.