People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to?
Modern people are accustomed to single-use products and have a tendency to use them for a short period of time and after that to dispose of them. The main reason for it is the consumer mentality, which has a range of negative consequences for an individual and for society as a whole.
The roots of throwaway mentality lie in the race of manufacturers who are trying to increase profit in any possible way. Thus, the public is constantly bombarded by advertisements, pop-ups, and promotions encouraging a person to buy a brand new product in spite of the fact that a consumer as rule has already possessed it. Therefore, completely our environment as well as consumer society provokes humans to change items very quickly without real need. Additionally, in order to make the manufacturing profitable, fabricators used to use cheap materials that have a short lifespan. As a result, in present times if anything was broken it is cheaper to buy a new item than to fix it.
It is obvious, that this kind of behavior will lead to quite a negative scenario for the ecosystems. First, disposal items will produce enormous dumping sites around the world and contaminate soils, water, and air. For instance, even nowadays there are so-called “Dead zones” in the ocean, which are covered by garbage such as plastic wrappers, packages, cans, and etc. As a result, these zones become uninhibited because no live creature is able to survive in such conditions. In addition, the unthoughtful consumption of natural resources for manufacturing will definitely lead to depletion of them. Consequently, if humankind does not stop the policy of single-use items, it will result in a highly polluted Earth environment and insufficient for survival natural resources.
In conclusion, the usage of disposal items leads to severe issues for the environment and humankind as a whole. Personally, I believe that this kind of shortsighted decisions in terms of disposal product should be changed as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-07 | Mariamirabella | 84 | view |
- You visited your friend s hometown last month and promised to meet him but you could not Write to your friend Expressing your apology Explaining why you couldn t meet Suggesting when to meet later 73
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
- Shopping is seen as one of the most favourite ways to spend spare time for young people Why do you think it is happening Should they be encouraged to spend less time on that 73
- Many people nowadays tend to marry and have children in their thirties rather than at a younger age Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...have a tendency to use them for a short period of time and after that to dispose of them. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ch as plastic wrappers, packages, cans, and etc. As a result, these zones become uninhib...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04235298079 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588414634146 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5183978862 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238096628291 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746652752369 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724493021525 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146505398717 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603036687156 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.