TPO 18 the Torreya taxifoha
The material discusses the concept of the ways that could be used to prevent the Torreya trees population from extinction. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding to this topic, namely Torreya trees could be reestablished in the same location with a microclimate weather. Next, relocating the trees in another place with cooler temperature. Finally, reserve the Torreya seeds in research centers.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is reestablishing the trees in the same location could not be happened, because their native location is strongly affected with the Global warming. The wet area in this place is drained, so the dryer weather is unlikely to have microclimate temperature. In addition to that, planting the trees in another cooler location may have unexpected outcomes. Foe example, when people relocated the Black Lucus trees in another place more suitable for their growth, they spread very quickly that killed many of the native trees of this location. Finally, the seeds that will be kept in the centers will not be able to resist diseases. They should be relatively large and genetically diverse. Furthermore, the centers do not have enough capacity to have the diverse population.
In summary, there are obvious discrepancies with the information
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the Torreya seeds in research centers. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pacity to have the diverse population. In summary, there are obvious discrepanc...
^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vious discrepancies with the information
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49333333333 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85956398299 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3696395829 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263245141684 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931454745135 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074513652386 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14081450777 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918533388611 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.