The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007
The bar chart illustrates the spending hours each week that youngers participate in entertaining activities over 6 years between 2002 and 2007, in Chester.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that watching television was the most popular for youngers over the period whereas bowling is not. Likewise, the trend of entertainment was focused on discos, television and shopping.
The favorite activities for teenagers were watching television, which got the same time at 25 hours in 2002 and 2003 as well as rose to 37 hours significantly in 2007. also, there was a similar increase in going to pubs and shopping. For visiting discos, youngers interested at 8 hours at the beginning and raised to 18 hours steadily at the end; also, while shopping just spent 7 hours every week in 2002, it reached 15 hours in 2006 and kept consistent until 2007.
Doing homework and playing sport were the same as the decreasing result, from 12 hours and 10 hours to 7 hours and 2 hours independently, for 6 years. Though watching DVDs owned an increase at the first 3 years from 11 hours to 18 hours, eventually, it was declined to 10 hours. Finally, as for bowling, which held the lowest support over six species of activities, from 4 hours in 2002, dropped to almost 1 hours only
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Komaldeep | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 11 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s between 2002 and 2007, in Chester. Overall, it can be clearly seen that wat...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on discos, television and shopping. The favorite activities for teenagers we...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...rose to 37 hours significantly in 2007. also, there was a similar increase in going ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2006 and kept consistent until 2007. Doing homework and playing sport were th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, likewise, so, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85388127854 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72623007744 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3817823894 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308275457413 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123902953654 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121422905296 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196781847648 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14000409226 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.