The bar chart compares to the proportion of city and country side residence with had a web-enabled in a European region from 1999 to 2004. Overall, it is clearly seen that, the highest percentage of households which had internet access was urban area during the period. In addition to the that, people living in provinces had a web-enabled increased until the whole years.
In the beginning of the time slot, (in 1999) while approximately 15% civic had an internet access. In 2000, the per cent of accessing of internet in town remained twice as high as in 1999 with 30%. Despite the dramatic rose in the last 3 years, the number of users increased significantly until the 2004.
On the other hand, less than 3% rural used internet in 1999. Over the next 5 years, internet access in rural families continued to increase considerably. Between 2000 and 2004, the proportion of rural users grew from almost 5% to nearly 35%.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004 74
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- In your opinion, should young people choose their professions, or should their parents choose for them? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ately 15% civic had an internet access. In 2000, the per cent of accessing of inte...
^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increased significantly until the 2004. On the other hand, less than 3% rural us...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oportion of rural users grew from almost 5% to nearly 35%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63506997061 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6047548493 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366685782759 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13406561423 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059711908101 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229274430741 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308756642817 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.