The given bar charts delineate information about the number of graduate and postgraduate students who did not have full-time job after finished a university in 2008 in the UK.
According to the first graph, it is clear that students studying further formed the highest amount by 29665 graduate students and following by part-time work by 17735 students. In addition to that 16235 graduate students did not work in any job. Also, the figure showed that after graduating, the minority of the students preferred volunteer work by 3500 students.
Moving back to the second chart, approximately the same number of students worked in part-time job with 2535 or further study comprising just more than 190 postgraduate students. Contrary to these students, 1625 of whom were not in the work force. Besides, the number of students opting for voluntary work were 345 which was the lowest amount of destination.
Overall, students studying further destination had the highest amount in the given both group whereas voluntary work destination included the lowest number of postgraduate and graduate students.
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 84
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 78
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...ate students who did not have full-time job after finished a university in 2008 in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3275862069 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75227358902 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0843984573 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245782247642 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122138986955 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871342304571 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173046508763 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968107205055 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.