International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages?
Based on the globalization, there are lots of nations become open-minded in the field of tourism and it is the prime reason which facilitates citizens have a chance to expose to this smokeless industry as a milestone. Even when this leisure industry still exists many problems but I believe that the drawbacks outperform the benefits.
It is comprehensible why many countries advocate the tourism and it is not pricey like in the previous years. First of all, personal income of residents is higher than before so they can afford to these journeys which brings a huge profit to tourist destinations. As a result, the politicians make use of those revenues to foster an efficient transport system and improve their facilities which lift up the country’s profile. Secondly, indigenous residents ought to broaden their horizon due to travelling. For example, people will expose to the cultural diversity while they travel abroad. Nowadays, strengthening the knowledge about other cultures is integral because of integration trend nationwide.
However, in spite of the fact that tourism plays a vital role in the financial countries, there are still some drawbacks that the governments cannot bypass. On top of that, when lots of foreigners visit a countries, the security of nations will be at risk because the authorities may find it hard to suppress the criminals. There is no doubt that this situation can be out of control when many travelers come their countries and bring evils such as heroin, cannabis and so on. Last but not least, citizens are able to lost their cultural identity due to the cultural interference. Consequently, according to the analysis of many experts when people attempt to get familiar with other customs, it will pose a threat to their own cultural uniqueness.
To conclude, it is undeniable that traveling can enhance the economy of countries but it also wreck the traditions of nations. I strongly believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | vu phung | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | phanduydat | 84 | view |
- More people today are overweight than ever before.What are the primary causes of this?What measures can be taken to overcome this epidemic? 89
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selectin 56
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a country' or simply 'countries'?
Suggestion: a country; countries
... of that, when lots of foreigners visit a countries, the security of nations will be at ris...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrecks'?
Suggestion: wrecks
...ce the economy of countries but it also wreck the traditions of nations. I strongly b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20679012346 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94618933986 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58950617284 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6537909597 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8666666667 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16248250039 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536823598665 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544725294401 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104326737968 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494247641089 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.