The diagram illustrates the male and female population between 1990 and 2000 in 6 countries
The bar chart compares and contrasts the data in the number of men and women in 6 countries, which are measured in percentage, from 1990 to 2000.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that the male proportion in 5 countries was higher than female, except from brazil during an 11-year period.
The man percentage in China was depicted at approximately 90% between 1990 and 2000; whereas, Bangladesh had the lowest proportion in male population (47%). In brazil, the female population was illustrated at comparatively 85%, which was 10% higher than that of the Kuwait. On the other hand, pakistan had the least percentage of female in both 1990 and 2000.
Among the categories, relatively 10% was the rise in both men and women proportion after 11 years. In comparison, the female percentage in pakistan was only half of the male while in brazil, the former were nearly the same.
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- People mainly type on keyboards nowadays rather than write things down by hand. As a result, handwritng skills are getting worse. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. What are the benefits of writing by hand. 89
- The diagram illustrates the male and female population between 1990 and 2000 in 6 countries 61
- the pie illustrates the percentage of level of education of women in someland in 1945. write at least 150 words 73
- the line graph illustrates changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the data in the number of men and women in 6 countries, which are measured in pe...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in percentage, from 1990 to 2000. A closer look at the diagram highlights ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom brazil during an 11-year period. The man percentage in China was depicted...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of female in both 1990 and 2000. Among the categories, relatively 10% was...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93421052632 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73085757638 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9489294341 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311125179309 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128401038794 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714690218682 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152874197539 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100321733123 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.