Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Predominantly successful careers are results of years of passionate hard work. This can be seen for many former leaders and one of whom is Abraham Lincoln. Despite coming from humble start and being subjected to haughty disregards in his earlier years, his passion catapulted him to be one of the great presidents. On the other hand, if institutes discourages students from pursuing their field of interest just on the basis of poor academic performance then long term implications may not be propitious. It is certainly difficult to judge a person's capabilities solely on academic prowess and even some attain success very late in their careers. For what it is worth, we can certainly agree that people pursuing field not within their interest do not have fulfilling careers and often do not realise their full potential.
Educationists should play their role as mentor and guide for the students. Which means helping them to become a version of themselves and not as something they perceive as success. That part should be left to job consultants and HR of companies. Rather than dissuading, teachers must assist struggling students in overcoming their weakness and lacking.
The scenario is not completely black and white though. In extreme cases, it becomes obvious to redirect a student's interest. Major physical disabilities may prevent a student to become an athlete and it the responsibility of the institution to guide him/her to a more pragmatic or suited field. Likewise, it also quixotic for seniors in college to change major on a whim during their final semester. With that said, certain regulations must be enacted to maintain a standard system.
All in all, dissuading students from seemingly failing career paths is in not necessarily status quo of success. Schools and colleges have the responsibility to nurture well rounded graduates through provision of conducive learning environment and not by micromanaging every nooks and crannies of choices students make.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 62
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia – the scent of lavender flowers – has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where 55
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, may, so, then, well, even so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28075709779 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91103444597 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643533123028 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7811661745 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4705882353 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196116892393 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486899758527 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560802367915 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108254924308 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323125428954 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.