The bar chart demonstrates the number of male and female learners who studied in six major subjects namely Marketing, Accounting, Finance, Economics, Engineering and Mathematics at a US university in 2010.
It can be seen that except for finance, the other had the different number of male and female students. In addition, finance was also the subject that had the most learners.
Looking at the detail, the number of male learners enrolling in the two subjects (Accounting and Mathematics, with 160 students and 200 students respectively) was higher than the female ones who chose those subjects. However, the most attractive major for both sexes was Finance, made up for 230 students while the opposite trend was witnessed the figure of males and females who enrolled Engineering about 60 learners.
The figure of male students taken part in Mathematics, which stood at 200 people, was almost four times as much as that of women. Standing at 150 males, the number of them was double times of females in Econonmics. With no doubt, the total of males choosing Economics was much less than that of Mathematics, at 150 people.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The map below shows how changes were made to the floor of a house after 2 years 11
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternati 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, except for, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71753530634 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1077070381 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207318083723 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916641240141 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997052927323 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141886730661 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120530570599 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.