The maps of Grange Park provide information about the past view of park and how it looks like now.
Overall, major renovation took place in the area over time.
In 1920, in Grange Park, which was located between Arnold Avenue and Eldon street, were three rose gardens between seats in different places. Moreover, the left side had a stage for musicians and a fountain in front of it. Furthermore, in the right bottom corner was a large glasshouse when in the right corner was located a pand for water plants.
Likewise, one of the massive changes was occurred in the center of the park where a rose garden and seats around it replaced the basic fountain. However, the fountain was modernized by water feature and was placed to the right bottom of the park. Moreover, a café and a big play area for children were built and a small stage that was at the left side was restructured to a huge amphitheater for concerts. In addition, a new facility, that is the entrance underground car park, was built at the right bottom corner.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- Some people prefer to live in rented homes Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 Causes of land degradation by region 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6393442623 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46292342922 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4987350476 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110267653148 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519029712177 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495328876769 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073277487798 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564371958662 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.