Below is Grange Park, a public park which was opened in 1920 and has encountered several changes during 79 years. From these two maps we can see that there are many changes made, ranging from the west side to the east side.
From the west side, we can see that Stage for Musicians that existed in 1920 has been replaced with Amphitheater for Concerts in 2019. Furthermore, Rose Garden that was located in the lower side does not exist anymore in 2019, while the upper Rose Garden still remains. In the center of the Grange Park, fountain that used to exist in 1920 has been replaced with Rose Garden furnished with four Seats around. However, South and North Entrances remain the same.
In the east side, where Rose Garden was formerly located, now has been turned into a Cafe. Besides, Pond for Water Plants has also been changed into Children's Play Area. And also, Glasshouse which was previously on the bottom side has been changed with Water Feature. Furthermore, there is an installment of Entrance Underground Car Park.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 56
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars. From these two maps we can see that there are many changes made, ranging fro...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tain that used to exist in 1920 has been replaced with Rose Garden furnished with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79775280899 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24499893084 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2318968544 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966004912279 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458513514735 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652842793289 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075472429612 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436685915653 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.