It might seem logical,at first glance,to agree with the above-mentioned argument that cleaning the water of Mason river will inevitably increase the water sports activity there.However, in order to evaluate the validity of the argument,we need to have significant amount of evidence regarding this argument. Hence, in order to determine this evaluation we need to delve deeper.
First of all,the first piece of evidence that we would need to know is the information about the actual reason of rarely using the water body of Mason river for water sports activities.It may be possible that the citizens use other river for their sports activity which thus make the Mason river an optional for their activity. If this happens, then it is going to weaken the argument conspicuously and the decision of allocation of city government money in year's budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities would be abortive.
Secondly, the argument points out that Mason city residents relish to indulge in water sports activities like fishing, boating, swimming and also states that for years,residents have been repining about the poor water quality and which is why the city government have decided to take those above-mentioned steps.Now the interest fact is that, the argument did not mention whether the habit of sports have been changed or not among the citizens during these years of government's dereliction towards the Mason river. If so, then cleaning up the Mason river and procurement of riverside amusement facilities would not help to allure citizen anymore to engage in water sports which would leave this argument unwarranted.
Moreover, the argument fails to represent enough evidence regarding the reasons behind the reason for not using the Mason river for sports activity.If government allocate enough money to clean up the water body and to provide other recreational facilities might increase the sports activity along the river but if they fail in maintaining the quality of river water and updating others facilities regarding recreational facilities, it will surely dwindle the extent of sports activity.And, there is no mention about the money allotment on maintenance which squarely make this argument unconvincing and fallacious.
By way of conclusion, it can be said that the above argument is practically based on some faltering speculations,trudging conjectures, which are apocryphal and indeed, not enough to draw any conclusion as the author of the argument has mentioned.Therefore,it can be concluded that this argument is categorically skewed and unwarranted.
- 1.The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 66
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your response. 60
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment - doing things they like to do - rather than doing things they should do." 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 414 350
No. of Characters: 2150 1500
No. of Different Words: 192 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.511 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.193 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.755 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 41.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 25.48 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.433 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.693 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.164 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
It might seem logical,at first glance,to agree with the above-me...
^^^
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , to
It might seem logical,at first glance,to agree with the above-mentioned argument...
^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ncrease the water sports activity there.However, in order to evaluate the validity of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...to evaluate the validity of the argument,we need to have significant amount of evid...
^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...we need to delve deeper. First of all,the first piece of evidence that we would n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...Mason river for water sports activities.It may be possible that the citizens use o...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , residents
... swimming and also states that for years,residents have been repining about the poor water...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Now
...ded to take those above-mentioned steps.Now the interest fact is that, the argument...
^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ing the Mason river for sports activity.If government allocate enough money to cle...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...reational facilities might increase the sports activity along the river but if they fa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...y dwindle the extent of sports activity.And, there is no mention about the money al...
^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , trudging
...lly based on some faltering speculations,trudging conjectures, which are apocryphal and i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...he author of the argument has mentioned.Therefore,it can be concluded that this argument ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... of the argument has mentioned.Therefore,it can be concluded that this argument is ...
^^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t can be concluded that this argument is categorically skewed and unwarranted.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 16.3942115768 171% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 401.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48379052369 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13415244509 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483790523691 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.8473053892 219% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 163.242486427 57.8364921388 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 274.875 119.503703932 230% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.125 23.324526521 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.125 5.70786347227 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.25449101796 285% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246559794385 0.218282227539 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107941364073 0.0743258471296 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848499686461 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140787860472 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954684637454 0.0628817314937 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.4 14.3799401198 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.27 48.3550499002 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.1628742515 222% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 12.197005988 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.5979740519 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 11.1389221557 198% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.