Some people believe that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city.Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city.
Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is true that whether to live in a horizontal city or vertical city remains a source of controversy. While a number of people believe that living in a vertical city is the best option, I would argue that cities with skyscrapers and high-rise building offer more advantages.
On the one hand, living in horizontal does wonders for residents in some ways. Firstly, people have to pay less for building services. If residents settle in a private house, they may save a great deal of money since they will not have to pay for building services like security or cleaning services. Secondly, living in lower to the ground is safer for inhabitants when emergencies occur. For example, if a fire starts, they can quickly escape from dangerous areas because the building is not too high off the ground and it will not take to much time to leave.
On the other hand, I believe that living in a vertical city is the best choice for me. First, a skyscraper offer a large amount of departments for inhabitants so the government can use land to build hospitals, schools or places for entertainment instead of residential areas. Furthermore, it is much more convenient for residents to live in a flat in a complex building which offers a range of services, thanks to shopping malls, fitness and other service centers on lower floors.
In conclusion, living in vertical cities does have some benefits. However, because of variety of advantages that skyscrapers offer, I would like to choose a life in a vertical city.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 quangphan4697 56 view
2019-08-08 quangphan4697 56 view
2019-08-08 quangphan4697 56 view
2019-08-08 quangphan4697 56 view
2017-04-19 theresa_trangnguyen 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...igh off the ground and it will not take to much time to leave. On the other hand,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80384615385 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74675440535 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2932373408 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232024318038 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109374629779 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102909502929 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169523064704 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929304265883 0.056905535591 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.