The bar charts give information about rates of worklessness and average weekly earning in respect of educational level in 2013.
Overall, both high school and some colleges graduates labelled the highest proportion of unemployment by their educational background whereas they created the lowest two weekly wages.
The first graph clearly shows that the level of education increased, the unemployment level is decline. People having graduate degree slightly more than one percent with 1.2% could not any job. The second lowest per cent of joblessness according to educational status was the college degree grads by 2.5%. The proportion of some college formed almost two and a half as high as the graduate degree rate. Lastly, high school diploma holders constituted maximum lornness about rates with other different levels graduating.
Along this line, rate of earn money changed in the same direction unemployment rate. It is noticeable that people receiving bachelor's degree took money than other types of degrees with $1500. While college graduates made money with $1100, some college and high school diploma got money to their jobs with $675 and $600, respectively.
- Life now is better than it was 100 years ago To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 52
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 78
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education. 78
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3956043956 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62287688507 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2902913139 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216298930676 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956234037015 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103343592348 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131163620145 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722814609176 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.