Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family?
There is a controversial issue about the impact that grandparents cause by nurturing children on the household. Some social workers state that it is unfavorable for the household, while some politicians claim that it is beneficial. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of positive effects.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers advocate that it is desirable for kids to be raised by grandparents. The first reason is that the help of grandparents usually helps couples to build career. Many young parents cannot build a career, since they are engaged in parenting, but retired members of family can take a responsibility for upbringing, which enables them to succeed at work. Another reason is that granddads frequently teach youngsters better than biological parents. The elderly have more experience than the other relatives, so they can share both invaluable wisdom and advice with growing generations. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that child caring by grandparents is a desirable trend.
However, some politicians propagate that it is unfavorable for children to be nurtured by grandparents. They justify their opinion with the following reasons. Firstly, they cannot teach children modern lifestyle. Many older people are unaware of contemporary trends, which are important for youngsters to master, so they cannot fully replace parents in development. Secondly, they are usually not able to care for children. Many grandmothers are unable to nurture offsprings, since they are both too old as well as physically incapable, so they cannot entirely substitute parents, no matter how eager they want. As a result, it is rational to say that upbringing by the elderly is a negative tendency.
In conclusion, even though some social workers believe that it causes an adverse impact on the family, if grandfathers care for young family participants, I think that it is advantageous for all members of family for the above mentioned reasons.
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problem 84
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- The television is good for you.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 11
- Sports stars are paid too much for what they do Discuss 92
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe your plans for the partyinvite your neighbour to com 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...offsprings, since they are both too old as well as physically incapable, so they cannot en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29153605016 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97872950651 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567398119122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5335545792 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796377243475 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280175125705 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322835801172 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488922777265 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190684661196 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.