Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There is a controversial issue about the importance of animal protection in their natural habitats. Some politicians state that this activity is wasteful for the budget, while some defenders of fauna argue that people should continue their attempt to save wild life. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea of further protection.
Let us start with reasons why some politicians say that defense of animals is unnecessary expenditure in this century. The first reason is that many endangered species cannot restore its original numbers. It does not matter how much money governments spend on recovery of animal world to its initial state, their numbers remain the same, because humans have occupied so much of their natural environment that it detrimentally affects their population. Another reason is that poaching is difficult to eradicate. Poachers will never stop hunting on endangered animals, until poverty prevails in their regions, so any attempts to save wild life are in vain, unless governments provide locals with everything necessary, such jobs and products. As a result, governments waste both money and human resources on this fruitless endeavour, which could be used to alleviate the burden of poor people.
However, some animal defenders advocate that in 21st century authorities should keep protecting fauna further. They justify their opinion with the following reasons. Firstly, species at risk would become extinct with no protection. Many animals have disappeared in unprotected areas, since officials have stopped combating illegal usage of land as well as hunting. Secondly, the loss of biodiversity might have negative effects human beings. Since people are part of ecosystem, wide extinction of other creatures may trigger unknown illnesses or a large shortage of crops, which may destroy mankind as well. Therefore, people need to preserve other species, if they want to secure their own wellbeing.
In conclusion, even though some politicians propagate that it is an unreasonable attempt to save wild life in these days, I think that governments should preserve natural world for the above mentioned reasons.
- Children have more and more tests and exams to do at school. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exams? 84
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course. You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter:describe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action 78
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42772861357 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73231511666 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4815752036 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133547309928 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401571949848 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359394339759 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761126476543 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322658588243 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.