Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
The author of the topic states an assertion Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. While some may argue that this statement holds true all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
The first part of the author claims that some people believe that to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Because political leaders are the representative of the people, they are responsible for taking problems or demands of people from their constituency to the government of their state. So they must yield to public opinion as they are one who chooses them as their representative, but saying that abandon principle for the sake of compromise is not right. As it will only lead to confusion on the part of their credibility. We have several examples where the leader never compromises their principle in any situation, for example, Mahatma Gandhi the hero of Indian independence never compromises his ideology of non-violence in any case or situation.
The second part of the author claims that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Yes, not only the leader but also every individual should not compromise with their principles and objective. If they are not following your objective and principle then their morality will be doubted and ultimately they will turn out to be the non-reliable leader in the society and they can lose their credibility and trust of people who voted them. But according to me principle and objective should be change with the time because with time the need of the society changes and as the leader, they should understand that and make their objective and principle in consideration of society benefits.
In nutshell, we can say that an effective leader in any society is identified by his commitments towards principles and objectives; it creates a clear picture of the leader and engenders trust on him in the minds of the people, but with time their principle and objective must be change in order to continue their service for public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yswang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | sudesh tiwari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Daffodilia | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
- employees 68
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years. 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 59
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant mon 23
- those who make the decision on the basis of their emotion and then justify them tend to be poor decision-maker. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or the sake of compromise is not right. As it will only lead to confusion on the p...
^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...to me principle and objective should be change with the time because with time the nee...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, while, for example, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09047619048 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81847243167 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421428571429 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1798140782 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.714285714 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487554314524 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205795363591 0.0831039109588 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203065997621 0.0758088955206 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323952296048 0.150359130593 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136525339695 0.0667264976115 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.