Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
Intially, the argument made by the author in the text above, seems plausible as the links perpetuated between the two sides of the spectrum, not consuming green tea to consuming great quantities of it, reveals the idea that drinking green tea in moderation is the most effective way of taking advantage of the drink. Once the argument is inspected, many questions arise regarding the reliability of other assumptions made through the text. Ultimately, when presented with scrutiny the argument is flawed unless data is presented to support it.
To begin, the main point made is that green tea is good for the consumer, therefore many individuals choose to consume high quantities, to obtain greater benefits. No data is provided to substantiate why green tea is good for people. It is said that it can help as a powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting tool, but what evidence is there of this actually being the case? It contrasts to another point later on in the argument, as it is said that high quantities of green tea can have negative effects. Moreover, no mention is made that perhaps the reason why people seek to drink it, is because they enjoy the taste. This seems like a simple explanation as to why people like to imbibe the tea.
Moving on to another example of lack of evidence. The argument says that high quantities of green tea can have similar effects to those of chronic coffee drinking. It would be wonderful if data was provided to back up this point, but its implied that we should believe the argument only because a 'study' was made in the past. We don't know who did it and the process of the study to determine its validity. Nonetheless, its been known that consuming large amounts of anything can be detrimental to our health. Even water in great amounts can be bad for our bodies. Perhaps this simple example if used in the text could prove to be more effective than to mention the result of a study and no more information about it.
Lastly, the entire argument only suggests an issue which can be studied further. The hypothesis could be to explore the effects of small, medium and large consumption of green tea. This should have been performed before the assumptions were made by the author. That way, he would have all the tools and the evidence necessary to maintain rationally the position taken in the text above. Unless this study is fully exercised, the argument will remain an idea that has not been proven true.
It is suggested that drinking green tea can be good for consumers, but if imbibed in large quantities, could have negative effects as well. No evidence is provided to maintain the positions in the argument, and only one coherent idea can come out of this: a study should be done to prove if the idea is correct. The author fails to see this point and instead makes the assumption that moderation is the best way to deal with this dilemma. If the study were to be completed in a proper manner, then the author would have full credentials to make an assertion regarding this subject. As it stands, that is not the case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 49 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | anirudh8860 | 57 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Shubham Bait | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Nikhil Nanjappa | 69 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | jinquanw | 65 | view |
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 49
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 46
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 542 350
No. of Characters: 2479 1500
No. of Different Words: 238 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.825 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.574 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.468 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.285 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.463 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ecause a study was made in the past. We dont know who did it and the process of the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 474, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...emma. If the study were to be completed in a proper manner, then the author would have full creden...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.6327345309 183% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2546.0 2260.96107784 113% => OK
No of words: 541.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70609981516 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53784365179 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449168207024 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5086814833 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9230769231 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8076923077 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57692307692 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188938695478 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541077933063 0.0743258471296 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573678473504 0.0701772020484 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117046743842 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786703500028 0.0628817314937 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.5979740519 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.